Skip to content

Head-to-head comparison

Fillbook vs Stonk Journal

Both platforms are strong on price. The clearest functional difference is broker automation: Fillbook auto-syncs with several platforms directly, while Stonk Journal currently relies on manual entry or CSV import.

Feature and pricing comparison

FillbookStonk Journal
PricingFree / $14.99/mo / $24.99/moFree / $10/mo
Free trial / free tier Yes7-day trial on paid plans; free plan has no time limit. YesFree tier, no trial needed.
Futures support YesContract-level P&L using real tick and point values Yes"Proper contract multipliers" stated for futures and forex
Prop-firm functionality YesTrailing/static drawdown, daily loss, consistency, breach alerts YesSeparate account tracking plus weighted compliance scoring
Automated broker/platform sync YesTradovate, NinjaTrader, Interactive Brokers; others via CSV NoManual entry and CSV import only; broker auto-sync stated as on their roadmap
R-multiple Yes Not independently verified
Expectancy Yes Not independently verified
Profit factor Yes Not independently verified
Drawdown tracking Yes Yes
Behavioral analytics YesRevenge trading, overtrading, time-of-day decay Not independently verified
AI features YesChat assistant answers questions against your own trade history YesAI Coach and AI chat, Pro tier ($10/mo)
Trade replay YesChart view with your planned stop overlaid No
Backtesting YesManual what-if trade builder, not automated against historical data No
Mobile app YesInstallable PWA, not a native app store app YesInstallable PWA, not a native app

Stonk Journal's pricing and features checked directly against Stonk Journal's own site on 2026-08-27. Rows marked "Not independently verified" could not be confirmed either way and are not presented as "No."

Which is better for a futures trader?

Both confirm futures support. Stonk Journal states "proper contract multipliers" for futures and forex; Fillbook calculates P&L per contract using each instrument's actual tick and point value.

Which is better for a prop-firm trader?

Both track prop-firm-relevant rules. Stonk Journal offers separate account tracking plus weighted compliance scoring; Fillbook tracks trailing/static drawdown, daily-loss, and consistency against your account's specific rules, with breach alerts.

Which provides stronger behavioral analysis?

Fillbook runs rule-based detection for revenge trading, overtrading, and time-of-day decay. Whether Stonk Journal's AI Coach performs equivalent pattern detection (beyond its stated dollar-impact quantification) wasn't independently verified.

Which costs less?

Fillbook: free plan (50 trades, one account), then $14.99/mo or $24.99/mo. Stonk Journal: free plan (unlimited trades and accounts), then $10/mo Pro (checked 2026-08-27).

See if Fillbook fits how you actually trade

Free plan covers 50 trades on one account with manual entry and CSV import, R-multiple tracking included — no card required.

Start free →

Frequently asked questions

Fillbook does (Tradovate, NinjaTrader, Interactive Brokers). Stonk Journal states broker auto-sync is on its roadmap, not currently available.

Stonk Journal's, on trade and account limits (unlimited vs. Fillbook's 50 trades on one account). Fillbook's free plan includes named R-multiple and expectancy metrics.

Stonk Journal's Pro tier ($10/mo) costs less than Fillbook's Pro tier ($14.99/mo), but Fillbook's Pro tier includes automated broker sync, which Stonk Journal doesn't currently offer at any price.

Looking for a switching guide instead? See Stonk Journal Alternative.Trading Journal — Fillbook · Futures Trading Journal — Fillbook · Trading Performance Analytics — Fillbook